Product
The Complete
Requirements Quality Platform
From first-pass automated review to stakeholder-ready documents — every step of the requirements quality workflow, in one place.
Quality Analysis
Senior BA-Level Review, in Seconds
Paste any requirement text and receive a structured peer review — the kind a trusted Senior Business Analyst would give before a sprint begins. Every finding includes the why, not just a label: why this gap creates downstream risk, and what a developer or QA engineer will run into if it isn't resolved.
The review answers one question: can a developer implement this correctly, and can QA verify it objectively? If the answer is no, you know exactly why.
Try It NowQuality Analysis
- ✓Five finding categories with clear visual weight hierarchy
- ✓Severity scoring: Critical, High, and Medium for blocking issues
- ✓Overall readiness score and confidence rating per review
- ✓Concrete recommendations paired with every finding
Smart Follow-Up Questions
Know What to Ask the Stakeholder
Not every gap is a blocker. Requirements Forge separates Required questions (must be answered before development starts) from Recommended questions (helpful context, but development can proceed with a reasonable assumption).
Questions are written the way a BA would phrase them: as genuine stakeholder queries, not generic checklists. Stakeholders know exactly what to prioritize.
Try It NowSmart Follow-Up Questions
- ✓Required vs Recommended question severity split
- ✓Questions reference the specific language from your requirement
- ✓No generic boilerplate — every question is requirement-specific
Artifact Generation
From Review to Work Items
Once a requirement is reviewed, generate a complete hierarchy of work items: Epics → Features → User Stories → Acceptance Criteria, Tasks, and Test Cases. Each user story includes three Given/When/Then acceptance criteria, two implementation tasks, and two test cases.
Work items can be linked directly to review findings — so a story created to address an ambiguity is traceable back to the specific finding that surfaced it.
Try It NowArtifact Generation
- ✓Full hierarchy: Epic → Feature → User Story
- ✓Three acceptance criteria per story (Given/When/Then)
- ✓Two implementation tasks and two test cases per story
- ✓Finding-to-artifact traceability
Human Review
System Does the First Pass. You Own the Decision.
Review findings are organized across five tabs — Analysis, Questions, Recommendations, Export, and History. Navigate findings by category, use the review as a coaching tool, and refine your requirement text directly within the app.
Every review can be regenerated: update your requirement based on findings and run a fresh review with one click. The human always owns the final requirement.
Try It NowHuman Review
- ✓Findings organized by category with severity badges
- ✓Edit and resubmit requirements without leaving the project
- ✓Regenerate review after addressing findings
- ✓Full submission history per project
Export
Ready for Your Project Management Tool
Export generated work items directly to Azure DevOps, Jira, Excel, or a flat CSV — in the format each tool expects. No manual reformatting.
Azure DevOps produces a two-file ZIP ready for the ADO import wizard. Jira export is a single importable CSV with configurable test case handling. Excel produces an eight-sheet workbook covering every level of the hierarchy. Generic CSV is a flat all-levels file for any other tool.
Try It NowExport
- ✓Azure DevOps: ZIP with two-file structure
- ✓Jira: CSV with configurable test case handling
- ✓Excel: XLSX with 8 sheets (Overview, Hierarchy, all levels)
- ✓Generic CSV: flat file covering all levels
Document Generation
BRD, FRD, and TRD — in Word
Generate structured business, functional, and technical requirement documents directly from a reviewed requirement. Each document is system-drafted with an executive summary, structured sections relevant to the document type, and a copy of the review findings embedded.
Documents export as Word files (.docx), ready to share with stakeholders or attach to a project management ticket. Generated from the Recommendations tab after a review completes.
Try It NowDocument Generation
- ✓Business Requirements Document (BRD)
- ✓Functional Requirements Document (FRD)
- ✓Technical Requirements Document (TRD)
- ✓Review findings embedded in every document
Review Templates
Domain-Specific Review Context
Six review templates add domain-specific context to the analysis — so the review understands the platform, the expected terminology, and the common gaps for that requirement type. Available on Consultant tier.
Templates cover the six most common Microsoft ecosystem requirement types. Select a template when submitting a requirement and the review engine applies that lens on top of the standard five-category analysis.
Try It NowReview Templates
- ✓Customer Service Case Management (D365)
- ✓Field Service Work Order (D365)
- ✓Power Automate Flow
- ✓Dataverse Data Model
- ✓Business Central Process
- ✓General / Other
Project History
Track Every Review Across a Project
Requirements are organized by project. Every submission is stored with its review, score, findings, and generated artifacts. The full submission history for any project is one click away.
Group related requirements together, keep client work separate, and track which requirements have been reviewed and which still need attention. Unlimited projects on all tiers.
Try It NowProject History
- ✓Unlimited projects on all tiers
- ✓Full submission history per project
- ✓Most-recent submission always surfaced first
- ✓Source badge distinguishes system-reviewed from imported requirements
Ready to review your first requirement?
Paste a requirement and get a structured senior BA-level review in seconds. No template library to maintain. No setup required.